Home / News / Local / EFCC denies targeting two dismissed officers

EFCC denies targeting two dismissed officers

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has faulted claims by the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria, HURIWA, alleging witch hunt of two former EFCC officers, Juliet Ibakaku and Michael Nzekwe, by the Commission.

The claims by the human rights group followed a publication by the commission in a half page disclaimer published on the two officers on Friday, May 7, 2015, which primarily sought to alert the public that the ex-officers have long ceased to be in the employment of the Commission and anyone who had dealings with them in spite of the notices, does so at his/her own risk.

According to the EFCC in a statement signed by its Head, Media & Publicity, Wilson Uwujaren, the claims by the human rights group, that the commission had targeted the duo for persecution which informed the publication was untrue.

“No reference was made to their alleged offences in appreciation of the fact that the two had pending matters in court. However in their desperation to ascribe sinister motives to the Commission’s action, they not only supplied the vital information that they were dismissed from service, but went ahead to bring up extraneous issues that have never been canvassed by them either in court or during the exhaustive internal disciplinary processes preceding their disengagement by the Commission. What their hired megaphones, HURIWA and Emmanuel Onwubiko would have the world believe, is that the officers were dismissed because they are Igbo or were fighting internal corruption. Nothing can be farther from the truth.

“For the avoidance of doubt, Nzekwe was dismissed for desertion, a serious offence against discipline. On July 30, 2013, he obtained a seven-day Casual leave and was expected back at his duty post on August 8, 2013. Not only did he fail to return to his duty post, Nzekwe travelled out of the country without authorization, in clear breach of service rule prohibiting such trips without management approval. Section 43(e) (i) of the EFCC Staff Regulations states that “Any officer who willfully absents for twenty one (21) consecutive days shall be guilty of the offense of desertion and shall be dismissed from the Commission as a deserter.”

When the officer was queried for absenting himself from work without authorization, he claimed he travelled to the United States,” to shop for medical options”, for his wife, Agatha who had an alleged renal challenge and was hospitalized in India.

“This information was found to be false, as evidence emerged that the officer went on a pleasure trip to the United States with his two daughters.

“It is strange that Nzekwe and his publicist would claim that he was disengaged arbitrarily despite evidence that he was subjected to the internal disciplinary process and appeared before the Senior Staff Disciplinary Committee. All through the process, he did not contest the fact that he violated the Commission’s service rule by staying off duty without authorization,” the EFCC statement said.

“If Onwubiko and HURIWA are to be believed, Nzekwe was dismissed for refusing to compromise a case in the investigation of the infamous pension fraud. From all intent and purposes, this clearly ingenious fabrication is intended to mudsling and cast aspersion on the leadership of the EFCC. At no time during the disciplinary hearing of the offence for which Nzekwe was dismissed did he mention or even insinuate that he was targeted for exposing corruption,” EFCC continued.

“On Ms Juliet Ibekaku claims that she was wrongfully dismissed and did not receive fair hearing. Without prejudice to the action in court, the internal disciplinary mechanism of the Commission as it affects staff who abandon their duty posts was exhausted before her dismissal.

“It is pertinent to state the case against Ibekaku as follows:

  1. Following her deployment to the Legal and Prosecution Department in the Lagos Zonal office, on 15 November 2013, Ibekaku reported to her new station for documentation on 21 November, 2013.
  2. On 22 November 2013, she was directed to report to her primary unit, the Legal and Prosecution Department but failed to honour the directive. Instead, she left and that was the last time she was seen in the Commission.
  3. On 16 December, 2013 (after 22 days absence), she was queried for abandoning her duty post without leave or authorization. Again, Ibekaku did not respond.
  4. In the spirit of fair hearing she was invited severally and given ample opportunity to state her case but spurned all.

“Consequently she was dismissed on 11 February, 2014, after 81 consecutive days absence from work) for desertion from duty post, contrary to Section 36 (l) (xi) of the EFCC Staff Regulation.

“Against this background, it is difficult to comprehend how the Commission’s disciplinary procedure for erring officers would be reduced to ethnic and political agenda by some mischief makers masquerading as human rights writers. Early this year, the Commission published a disclaimer on nine former employees who were similarly dismissed for offence against discipline. They include Samson Gambo, Abubakar Addu, Collins Ehichoya, Emmanuel Ohikhokhai, Umar Abdullahi, Meriam Momoh, Emmanuel Paul, Uno Edet Uno and Adamu Suleiman.

“None of these former officers are from the south east and so did not qualify to benefit from the human rights writers crusading zeal of Emmmanuel Onwunbiko and HURIWA. If one may ask, did the EFCC have the Igbo ethnic group in mind when its Staff Regulation was compiled? How does the disciplinary action of the Commission imperil the ambition of “one of the two” from succeeding Lamorde as EFCC Chairman or becoming a minister of the federal republic?” the EFCC asked.

About Global Patriot Staff

Check Also

Joe’s Market, Newark, New Jersey, re-opened; Alleged plastic fish sent for analysis

 Joe’s Fish Market on South Orange Avenue, in Newark, New Jersey, United States, has been …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *