LocalNewsOpinion

Good people must not be crushed by their own empathy By Emeka Asinugo

Goodness is a virtue the world endlessly claims to celebrate, yet often subtly punishes. At first glance, it seems that kindness should bring people together, that empathy should heal broken relationships in a broken society. But time and again, good people find themselves misunderstood, used, and even destroyed by those who interpret their kindness as weakness. It is a troubling paradox that those with the highest emotional intelligence, deepest compassion, and most generous hearts are the very ones who often suffer most at the hands of those others who had neither appreciated nor reciprocated their goodness. And this dilemma, as old as humanity itself, unfolds daily in homes, offices, communities, and even nations. Good people walk through life thinking others are just like them, honest, decent, forgiving, and kind. They see the world through lenses of empathy and accommodation, rarely anticipating betrayal, cruelty, or malice. It is this very belief that becomes their undoing when they cross paths with individuals who operate on a very different emotional frequency.

There was the case of Susan, a mid-level manager in a logistics company in Lagos. She was well known among her colleagues for being warm, considerate, and always willing to listen. Susan regularly took on extra tasks to help overwhelmed team members. She offered support to those facing personal difficulties. She covered for other colleagues during crises and never once demanded recognition. But over time, the very people she helped began to take advantage of her goodness. Some dumped their responsibilities on her. Others gossiped behind her back, accusing her of being manipulative just because they believed that she was “too nice.” Eventually, her mental health began to suffer. She became withdrawn and resentful, unsure of how her genuine concern had earned her contempt.

Susan’s experience is not uncommon. In fact, psychologists have a name for the kind of exploitation she experienced. It is called emotional vampirism, where people drain the empathy and energy of others for their own benefit. The more empathetic someone is, the more the fellow attracts individuals with narcissistic or manipulative tendencies. These emotional opportunists quickly sense the vulnerability that comes with unguarded kindness and exploit it. At the root of this issue is a cognitive distortion known as projection. Good people often assume that everyone else is like them. They think others value honesty, fairness, and compassion the way they do. Unfortunately, not everyone shares that worldview. Some are not only indifferent to the pain of others but actually delight in causing others pain. Some prioritize personal gain over fairness. And some see kindness not as something to be honoured or appreciated, but as a tool to be manipulated.

The reverse is also true. Those with hardened hearts, often the emotionally wounded or morally indifferent, believe that everyone else is also self-serving and transactional like them. When they encounter genuinely good people, they mistrust them or misinterpret their intentions. This disconnect leads to tension, misjudgment, and in some cases, outright abuse of the good person.

Take for example the story of Chuka, a young businessman from Enugu. After years of struggling, he finally found success in the agricultural export business. As a show of appreciation to God for his rise, he decided to help others get their footing in life. He offered interest-free loans to friends, mentored young entrepreneurs, and gave several struggling peers access to his contacts abroad. But within three years, most of the people he helped had either defaulted on agreements or tried to undermine him. One of them even went as far as to manipulate his client list and to start a competing firm. Disillusioned, Chuka withdrew from social engagements and became sceptical of every request for help. “I thought I was building others,” he said bitterly, “but they were busy digging holes under my feet.”

Both Susan and Chuka’s stories illuminate a troubling reality: being good-hearted in a complex world demands more than good intentions. It requires discernment. It requires boundaries. And above all, it requires the ability to say “no” without guilt. And this is where many good people falter. Raised to be agreeable, many of them associate assertiveness with rudeness. They equate setting boundaries with selfishness. They believe walking away from a toxic situation makes them unkind. But nothing could be further from the truth. The survival of goodness in the world depends not only on compassion but on the wisdom to protect that compassion from being crushed.

There is a well-known proverb that says: “You do not have to set yourself on fire in order to keep others warm.” It speaks directly to the heart of this dilemma. Empathy, when unrestrained and unguarded, can lead to burnout, resentment, and emotional collapse. Good people who constantly absorb the pain of others without any outlet or protection soon find themselves emotionally exhausted. And once broken, their capacity to do good is significantly diminished.

History and literature are full of examples where good people suffered for their virtues. In Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables, Jean Valjean’s transformation from a hardened criminal to a kind benefactor is met not with universal gratitude, but with suspicion and persecution. In real life, whistleblowers who speak out against injustice in their organizations often face backlash rather than praise. Teachers who go the extra mile for students, nurses who work overtime, or community leaders who push for reforms are frequently undermined by the very systems they seek to improve.

But it need not always end in disillusionment. There is a way for good people to remain good, and still survive the harshness of a world that often misuses kindness. It begins with awareness. Good people must understand that their empathy is a gift, but also a potential vulnerability. Not everyone is deserving of their emotional investment. By learning to assess character, to watch not just words but consistent behaviour, they can better choose where and how to offer their compassion.

Next is the cultivation of what some psychologists call “wise compassion.” This involves combining empathy with boundaries. A good person must learn to say, “I care about you, but I will not allow you to harm me or exploit me.” They must learn that refusing to be used is not a sign of cruelty, but of emotional maturity. Furthermore, good people need communities of their own, safe spaces where kindness is not taken for granted but reciprocated. In such circles, empathy becomes a source of strength, not a burden. These support networks can be found in religious groups, professional organizations, or simply in friendships where mutual respect is the rule.

Indeed, the time has come when society must begin to teach nationals and residents the need for emotional resilience alongside empathy. From schools to religious institutions, the idea that kindness must include self-respect should be a core principle. Children should grow up knowing that they can be both compassionate and assertive. They can be kind without being naive. They must appreciate that walking away from toxic people does not make them bad, it makes them wise. The world desperately needs good people. In times of conflict, it is the peacemakers who rebuild. In families torn apart by dysfunction, it is the kind-hearted who hold things and people together. In workplaces rife with competition and politics, it is the fair-minded who preserve dignity. But these good people must be protected from others, yes, but also from themselves.

Empathy is like a flame. It gives light. It gives warmth. But if left unguarded, it can be extinguished or worse, become a wildfire that consumes the very person who carries it. Therefore, goodness must grow up. It must shed the illusion that everyone shares its values. It must stop expecting fairness from the unfair, loyalty from the disloyal, and remorse from the remorseless. It must love wisely. It must forgive intelligently. It must help selectively. And above all, it must never, ever apologise for drawing the line. All said, the solution is not to harden hearts, but to strengthen them. To teach that true goodness is not the absence of anger or fear or hurt, but the ability to remain kind in a world that does not always make kindness easy. That kind of goodness does not break. It bends, it adapts, it grows. And it survives, because only by surviving can it continue to light the way for others.

Chief Sir Emeka Asinugo wrote in from the UK.

 

 

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button