Following the withdrawal of the suit, Justice Mohammed Idris awarded a punitive cost of N10, 000 against Tarfa in favour of the five respondents.
The respondents are the EFCC, its Acting Chairman, Ibrahim Magu, Mrs. Rashidatou Abdou, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) and MTN Nigeria Communications Limited.
Tarfa had filed the suit following his arrest on February 5 by EFCC operatives on the premises of the Lagos State High Court in Igbosere, where he allegedly hid two alleged suspects of economic and financial crimes in his car to prevent their arrest.
His two mobile phones and his Mercedes Benz SUV with Registration No. KJA 700 CG, had been confiscated by the EFCC.
However, in his N5bn fundamental rights enforcement action, Tarfa had urged the court to declare that the respondents violated his right to privacy protected by Section 37 of the Constitution, when, without a court order, MTN allegedly made the call log on his mobile line, 08034600000, available to the EFCC and the others respondents, who in turn allegedly released the information to Sahara Reporters and other online media.
The senior advocate had also urged the court to hold that the respondents acted unlawfully when they accessed his bank details, clients’ information, private and confidential information contained in his iPhone 6 and Samsung 6 without a court order or any reasonable cause.
He had urged the court to award N5bn damages against the respondents in his favour, stressing that no amount of money could adequately redress the “unquantifiable and irreparable damage done to him, his reputation, his business and his goodwill.”
But a lawyer from his chambers, O. Oladele, appeared before Justice Idris same Wednesday with an ex parte application to discontinue the case.
Oladele gave no reason for Tarfa’s decision to withdraw the case.
The EFCC lawyers, Mr. Wahab Shittu and Rotimi Oyedepo, who also appeared in court, said they were not opposed to the withdrawal of the suit but urged the court to award a punitive cost against Tarfa.
“My Lord, we have no objection to the discontinuance of the suit but we want the court to award a punitive cost against the applicant; our names have been flying around in the major newspapers since yesterday,” Shittu said.
Oladele argued that the EFCC’s lawyers had no right of reply because his application was an ex parte application.
Besides, he said the respondents could not be demanding for cost because Tarfa had not served them with the suit.
In a short ruling, Justice Idris struck out the suit and ordered Tarfa to pay a cost of N10, 000 to the respondents.